I checked 7 public opinion journals on Wednesday, July 08, 2026 using the Crossref API. For the period July 01 to July 07, I found 14 new paper(s) in 5 journal(s).

International Journal of Public Opinion Research

The effects of personality traits in interview time length in cellphone public opinion surveys
Ridvan Peshkopia, Don Salihu
Full text
The rapid proliferation of mobile phone opinion surveys calls for a better understanding of their efficiency. We explain the length of mobile phone survey interviews with respondent and interviewer personality traits from the Big Five personality model. Our results show that Agreeableness (which motivates harmony seeking) and Conscientiousness (which motivates duty fulfillment) were the best predictive traits, predicting shorter and longer interview times, respectively, when they characterized both the respondent and the interviewer. Neuroticism (which motivates threat sensitivity), however, predicted opposite effects. The two other personality traits of the Big Five model, Extraversion (which motivates social engagement) and Openness (which motivates novelty exploration) did not show significant effects. Moreover, we argue that while these core psychological traits are important separately, we should pay even more attention to their interaction. Our results show that the effects of the interactions are more complex than expected and require both careful interpretation and additional research. Our findings have practical implications for the public opinion survey industry, as they could help in the training of interviewers by taking into account their personality traits. We analyze data from a public opinion survey conducted in Albania and Kosovo during the winter of 2018–2019.

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties

Such a question, such an answer? An experimental study of wording effects in opinion surveys using the Swedish abortion law as a case
Henrik Friberg-Fernros, Elina Lindgren, Nora Theorin
Full text
Implementing the mail ballot: gauging voter preferences using a discrete choice experiment
Dominic Nyhuis, Felix MĂĽnchow
Full text
Misinformation and threats to self-interest
Mathieu Turgeon, Alessandro Freire
Full text
COVID-19 and performance voting: evidence from the 2021 state assembly elections in India
Subhasish Ray, Holli A. Semetko, Kiran Arabaghatta Basavaraj, Pahi Saikia, Anil M. Varughese
Full text
Inclusive selectorates, unrepresentative candidate lists? On inclusivity versus representativeness in candidate selection processes
R. E. van Dijk
Full text
Beyond winners and losers: trust and the occurrence of elections in a quasi-experimental setting
Yosuke Sunahara, Steven David Pickering, Martin Ejnar Hansen
Full text

Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology

Improving the Sensitivity of Controlled Experiments by Stratified Empirical Likelihood Ratio Tests
Yongda Wang, Daijun Chen, Chun Kai Wang, Shifeng Xiong
Full text
This article addresses the challenge of low statistical power in A/B testing with small sample data, such as Automatic Speech Recognition data. Traditional methods, such as the Welch t-test, often underperform in these scenarios. We introduce two novel testing methods, the stratified and post-stratified empirical likelihood ratio tests, which reduce group variance and enhance test sensitivity. Our theoretical analysis and comprehensive experiments on real and synthetic datasets show that these nonparametric empirical likelihood ratio methods outperform the Welch t-test with small-sample data, providing a more effective tool for detecting treatment effects and informing data-driven decision-making.

Public Opinion Quarterly

Women and Left-Wing Citizens Prefer Women Candidates: Testing Consistency and Psychological Processes Across Twenty Diverse Countries
Claire Gothreau, Lasse Laustsen
Full text
Across the world, women remain underrepresented in politics. Yet, recent experimental studies of candidate preferences find that citizens favor women over men candidates, with women and left-wing citizens driving aggregate preferences. This raises both theoretical and empirical puzzles. Theoretically, the underlying processes producing heterogeneous preferences across citizens’ gender and ideology remain unaddressed, and empirically, conclusions rest primarily on data from the United States and Western Europe, which raises questions about generalizability to democracies in the Global South and other regions. This article reports the results from the most comprehensive and geographically diverse test of citizens’ preferences for women candidates to date. We fielded a conjoint candidate choice experiment with a multitude of respondent-level predispositions (e.g., gender, ideology, sexism, and gender typicality) across twenty institutionally, culturally, and economically diverse democracies (N = 14,369). The results advance knowledge about citizens’ preferences for women candidates both empirically and theoretically. On average, women candidates are preferred by three percentage points, and this advantage is statistically significant in fourteen countries. Women—especially those identifying as more gender typical—and left-wing citizens—especially individuals low in social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and hostile sexism—display particularly strong preferences for women candidates. These results are discussed with respect to their theoretical and practical implications for women’s political representation.
How Do Americans Explain Their Party Identification and Out-Partisan Animosity?
Anthony Fowler, Gregory A Huber, Rongbo Jin, Lilla V Orr
Full text
Political scientists often claim that partisanship is explained by nonpolicy factors such as early childhood experiences, parental influence, and group membership. In this paper, we use open-ended survey questions to elicit partisan Americans’ own explanations for their affiliations as well as their attitudes toward the opposite party. Policy, values, and ideology are the most common reasons Americans say they identify as a Democrat or Republican and feel the way they do about members of the other party. The rate at which these reasons are cited far exceeds expectations of published scholars of partisanship. Findings do not vary meaningfully across party, region, gender, race, age, or socioeconomic status.
Ignoring Gender Compromises the Comparability of Cross-Cultural Survey Research
Andrej Findor, Kristína Kironská, Roman Hlatky, Ondrej Buchel, Matej Hruška, Amy H Liu
Full text
Survey measures of intergroup attitudes may not necessarily be comparable across countries. Androcentric bias—the propensity to position men as the universal standard—is more likely to arise among speakers of grammatically gendered languages than among speakers of languages without grammatical gender. When combined with outgroup male target bias—the tendency to evaluate outgroup men more negatively than outgroup women—androcentric bias may distort cross-national comparisons of survey measures across different language types. To evaluate, we conducted survey experiments with over 19,500 participants from 13 European countries. We randomly assigned participants to evaluate: (a) masculine or gender-neutral outgroup labels, or (b) gender-inclusive alternatives. On average, gender-inclusive labels evoked more favorable evaluations. Importantly, these positive effects were more consistently present in grammatically gendered languages. Our findings highlight potential challenges to measurement validity posed by variations in the grammatical embedding of gender across languages. Using gender-inclusive language improves measurement and may serve as a first step toward bolstering cross-national comparability.
Christian Nationalism as a Social Identity
Brooklyn Walker, Paul A Djupe, Anand E Sokhey, Donald P Haider-Markel
Full text
Over the past decade, research on Christian nationalism in the United States has grown substantially. Some of the associated public opinion literature has described Christian nationalism as an identity, and some of it as a worldview, but scholars have not grappled with this ambiguity or its consequences. Accordingly, we make two moves to bring conceptual order to this rapidly expanding literature. First, we use well-established social identity measures to assess whether respondents think of Christian nationalism as an identity, and we compare the responses to popular measures of the Christian nationalist worldview. Second, we use multiple survey experiments to evaluate the extent to which identification with Christian nationalism is dependent on the definition of Christian nationalism. We conclude that Christian nationalist identities exist, they are strongly linked with a Christian nationalist worldview, and to some extent they depend on the definition of the identity group. In this unique case of elite contestation of an emerging identity, we find that the typical worldview measure also serves effectively as a strength-of-identity measure.
Partisan Differences in Support for Political Violence: Results from a Natural Experiment in the United States
Chiara Vargiu, Alessandro Nai
Full text
The polarized reaction to the assassination of the UnitedHealthcare CEO in December 2024 underscored the potential of ideologically framed acts of violence to undermine societal cohesion and challenge democratic norms. While many condemned the killing as an unjustifiable attack on a private citizen, others celebrated Mangione as a “folk hero,” glorifying him and his act as a symbol of resistance against an industry perceived as corrupt and dehumanizing. Using data from a rolling cross-sectional survey in the United States, we causally tested partisan differences in support for political violence before and after the CEO’s assassination and the perpetrator’s subsequent arrest. While Democrats initially condemned violence against Republicans, their support for partisan violence increased following Mangione’s arrest. These results underscore the role of public discourse in shaping attitudes toward political violence, raising concerns about the normalization of politically motivated aggression, even among groups traditionally less inclined to endorse it.

Social Science Computer Review

Automating Content Analysis With Multiple LLM Agents: Impacts of Agent Attributes and Human–AI Collaboration
Xinyan Zhao, Chengshuai Zhao, Mordecai Mengesteab, Chau-Wai Wong, Mengqi Zhan, Zhen Tan, Tianlong Chen
Full text
Emerging research in computational social science has applied LLMs to automate content analysis, often by prompting a single model to act as a human coder. While a single LLM may suffice for a few manifest variables, it still falls short on diverse latent constructs. And the impact of LLM agent attributes on measurement outcomes remains unclear, limiting their validity for communication research. Drawing upon the literature on interacting agents and communication, this study examines the impact of agent diversity, agent open-mindedness, and human–AI collaboration (HAIC) in a multi-LLM-agent system for automated content analysis. The results demonstrate reliable and accurate measurement of four communication variables across three datasets, with improved performance following agent discussion. Additionally, agent open-mindedness, but not agent diversity, significantly affects measurement outcomes. These results highlight the potential of multi-LLM-agent systems for automated content analysis and suggest the importance of considering agent attributes and values in system design.