Consumption and expense (CE) data from surveys in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) are critical to understand social inequalities, formulate policies, and implement targeted benefits. However, little research has examined measurement error in these data. This paper investigates one potential source of measurement error: the respondent’s gender. This is important given the sharp differences in gender roles, attitudes, experiences, and identities in LMICs that may result in different responses from male and female respondents. We analyze CE values from 34 items that were collected from a recent large-scale survey of more than 46,000 households in India; females were respondents in 37 percent of these households. We use multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to examine if data from male and female respondents have measurement equivalence. We then use zero-inflated gamma models to investigate if respondent gender is associated with the prevalence of zero values and the magnitude of non-zero values, using propensity weights to adjust for possible selection biases. Results show that while most CE categories exhibit gender effects, effect sizes are generally modest. The effect magnitudes vary by CE category, and in general, female respondents are associated with more zeros and lower non-zero response values compared to male respondents. However, categories say annual education expenses or 30-day medical expenses see a larger average value for females compared with males. We find that the role of the respondent in shopping for the household and managing its expenses partially explains gender effects. The respondent’s age and education, and help received in answering the CE questions, moderate gender effects on non-zero CE values. We suggest avenues for future research and implications for survey practice.