I checked 18 political science journals on Tuesday, June 02, 2026 using the Crossref API. For the period May 26 to June 01, I found 57 new paper(s) in 11 journal(s).

British Journal of Political Science

Governance Values in Social and Political Belief Systems
Anthony Michael Bertelli, Silvia Cannas, Marika Danielle Csapo
Full text
Governance principles reflect procedural values that govern the means of implementing public policies. Using survey data from Italy and the United Kingdom, we explore the public’s orientations towards those principles. We model them as instrumental values in belief systems, and as components of a network of attitudes. We find that governance principles largely occupy their own community; their interdependence with each other is far greater than their dependence on any other values or attitudes. Public employment experience neither alters the internal integration of governance principles nor changes their relationship with the larger belief system. We observe low levels of dynamic constraint among governance value orientations and show evidence that higher-order values account for the greatest influence over them. They remain strikingly invariant to simulated shifts in other attitudes, though modestly more constrained in Italy than in the UK. Our results suggest that orientations towards transparency can be most strongly influenced by other beliefs.

Electoral Studies

What do voters want out of elections?
Semra Sevi, André Blais, Can Mekik
Full text
Threat of taxation and turnout of the rich: Evidence from danish upper house elections
Lasse Aaskoven
Full text
Winning incumbent mayors: Causal effects on local public spending, service delivery, and governance-related conflict in Indonesia
Blane D. Lewis
Full text
Do strategic voters have a strategic personality? Examining the role of machiavellianism in strategic voting
Scott Pruysers, Julie Blais, Luke R. Mungall
Full text
Greater intra-party democracy in candidate selection has different effects on gender, ethnicity and class
Chris Butler, Rozemarijn E. van Dijk, Marta Miori, Rob Ford
Full text
Candidate confirmation timing and voter preferences in Canadian federal elections
Nabil Afodjo
Full text
The resilience of local democracy: Natural disasters and the incumbent survival effect
Nima Taheri Hosseinkhani
Full text
Ethnic diversity, deprivation, and populist radical right voting: A rural-urban perspective on AfD support in Germany
Jessica Kuhlmann, Antonia Lang
Full text
Election outcomes and social trust in polarized times
Mark Williamson, Amber Hye-Yon Lee, Daniel Rubenson, Iva Srbinovska, David Sumantry, Jonah Davids, Annika Maulucci, Kristina Kisin
Full text
Bandwagon or Titanic? How outcome expectations influence voting in direct democracy
Oliver Strijbis
Full text
Money talks? Party financial incentives to promote underrepresented groups
Thiago do Nascimento Fonseca, Débora Thomé, João V. Guedes-Neto
Full text
The Green Gender Gap: Environmental attitudes and pro-environmental vote choice across Europe
Ingvild Zinober
Full text
Who does disproportionality favour? A measure for cross-domain comparison of disproportionalities
Chris Hanretty, Iain McMenamin
Full text
Generational replacement and voter turnout in Japan
Tetsuya Matsubayashi, Sohei Shigemura
Full text
Transnational political participation among dual citizens
Kaitlin Alper, Eroll Kuhn
Full text
Legitimising prejudice? The impact of radical right party presence on anti-immigration attitude expression
Irene RodrĂ­guez
Full text
District magnitude, Black political empowerment, and candidate emergence
Iris E. Acquarone, Matthew Hayes
Full text
Administrative unit proliferation in parliamentary systems: Evidence from turkish elections, 1960-2018
Murat Abus, Sabri Ciftci
Full text
A populist incitement? Populism, attack rhetoric, and support for political violence
Alessandro Nai, Elizabeth L. Young, Vlastimil HavlĂ­k, Alena KluknavskĂĄ
Full text
Voting under complex rules: How selectivity and political sophistication shape vote congruence
Jonathan R. Rinne
Full text
Challenging the ruler by visiting the voter: Evidence from Hungary
Olivér M. Råcz, Måtyås Bódi, Tamås Kovalcsik
Full text
Regional patterns in citizens’ reactions to a political assassination: Evidence from Japan
Taka-aki Asano, Shoko Omori, Masaki Taniguchi
Full text

European Journal of Political Research

Generic title: Not a research article
There is no such thing as ‘right-wing populism’: Reclaiming the emancipatory potential of populism in reactionary times – ERRATUM
Alex Yates, Aurelien Mondon
Full text
The stars down to the ballot box: Heterodoxy and comparative electoral behaviour
Narisong Huhe, Stratos Patrikios
Full text
Declining trends in civic participation and the growing success of anti-systemic parties reflect a crisis of democratic legitimacy unforeseen by popular readings of secularisation and modernisation theories. These readings expect the rise of rational, predominantly non-religious citizens and the parallel decline of conformist, religious citizens to strengthen democratic institutions. We update this popular approach, which is built on a dichotomy between the non-religious and the religious worldview, by adding a third worldview type: heterodox beliefs (eg in astrology, lucky charms, fortune tellers, and faith healing). Neither conventionally religious nor grounded in rational secularism, heterodoxy has survived and thrives in modern societies but remains overlooked by comparative political science. Heterodoxy reflects a culture of unhealthy scepticism, receptivity to unverifiable ideas and social atomism, and sustains unique patterns of electoral behaviour. Empirical analyses of the International Social Survey Programme (1991−2018) indicate that heterodoxy, unlike the other two core worldviews, favours both electoral apathy and anti-systemic party choice. The electoral effects of heterodoxy point to an alternative diagnosis of current challenges to democratic legitimacy.
The impacts of scandal-based coalition terminations on voters
Ida BĂŠk Hjermitslev, Florence So
Full text
In established democracies, governing parties are expected to govern effectively. Government terminations that result from breaking the rule of law, policy blunders, or disastrous policy performances have the potential to damage voters’ perceptions of how well democracy functions in their countries. Yet, current research on coalition politics has not examined the specific consequences of scandal-based government terminations on voters’ attitudes toward politics and the quality of democracy. We analyze the attitudinal impacts of scandal-based government terminations and argue that this type of termination reduces citizens’ satisfaction with the way democracy functions in their countries and their propensity to vote for the party responsible for the scandal. We also examine whether scandal-based coalition terminations negatively impact voter perceptions of the government’s performance. We test our arguments by relying on a recent scandal that took place in Austria: the so-called Ibiza scandal, which caused the early termination of the coalition between the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) and the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ). At the time the scandal broke, the Austrian National Election Study was in the field. We utilize an Unexpected Event during Survey Design to test if the scandal had consequences for voters’ perceptions of the parties and their collaboration. The supporting evidence for our argument calls for the need to revive research on government termination and to initiate a new line of research on how government breakdowns affect citizens’ democratic attitudes.
The (forgotten) atomistic fallacy in political science and its implications for how we interpret elections
Tim Vlandas, Daphne Halikiopoulou
Full text
Improvements in the availability, accuracy, and processing of individual-level data have allowed political science literature to address the ‘ecological fallacy’, whereby inferences are made about individuals based on units of analyses operating at a higher level. Yet there has been limited attention to the risk that individual-level analyses may suffer from the reverse ‘atomistic’ – or ‘individualistic’ – fallacy: the erroneous practice of drawing inferences about national-level outcomes based on individual-level analyses. In this research note, we present a mathematical statement and simulations to diagnose and evaluate the extent of this fallacy in the case of voting behaviour. We also illustrate the problem using European Social Survey data on far-right voting. We conclude by identifying three ‘perils’ of the atomistic fallacy, related to extrapolating conclusions about a party’s overall performance from information about an individual’s voting propensity. These perils can significantly affect how researchers interpret election results and, in turn, the policy implications of political science research.

Party Politics

The effect of electoral performance on party renomination in national and independent local parties
Hidde Van Slooten, Marijn Nagtzaam, Simon Otjes
Full text
The process of selecting candidates for representative assemblies is a key aspect of democratic governance. We examine how political parties, particularly in quasi-open list proportional representation systems like the Netherlands, weigh candidates’ previous electoral performance in renomination decisions. We propose that different kinds of parties weigh candidates’ popularity and their partisanship differently. Therefore, some parties are more sensitive to electoral performance. Specifically, we look at the differences between branches of national parties and independent local parties, where the latter may be more responsive to the electorate. We test our hypotheses on candidates running in 2018 and 2022 municipal elections in the Netherlands. This provides us with a rich dataset, covering more than 5000 parties running in more than 300 municipalities fielding more than 80,000 candidates while maintaining consistent societal and institutional contexts. Our study enhances our understanding to what extent parties prioritize candidates’ popularity, shedding light on the complexities of candidate selection and renomination decisions.

Political Behavior

Unbundling Digital Media Literacy Tips: Results from Two Experiments
Andy Guess, Shannon C. McGregor, Gordon Pennycook, David Rand
Full text
Even among the 92%, It’s Complicated: Examining Black Women Voters’ Emotions and Evaluations of Kamala Harris in the 2024 Election
Christine M. Slaughter, Camille Burge-Hicks, Nadia E. Brown
Full text
The Urban–Rural Divide in People’s Minds: Stereotypes of Urbanites and Ruralites in Nine European Countries
Sven Hegewald
Full text
Recent scholarship increasingly views the reemergence of the urban–rural divide in political behavior through the lens of social identity theory. Given this understanding of political divisions between cities and the countryside, it is crucial to investigate how urban and rural social groups are perceived, specifically, to what extent these groups are associated with entrenched stereotypes. Examining the urban–rural divide in people’s minds through a conjoint experiment, this paper sheds light on stereotypes of urbanites and ruralites in nine European countries. The results indicate that rural residents are typically viewed as Eurosceptic, anti-immigrant, working-class, older, and less educated. By contrast, typical urbanites are perceived as Europhile, pro-immigrant, upper-middle-class, younger, and university-educated. These perceptions are not held uniformly, however. Individuals tend to project their own characteristics onto others, perceiving those similar to themselves as more typical members of their place-based in-group. Likewise, a similar logic emerges regarding the relationship between urban–rural stereotypes and affect. While individuals tend to express warmer feelings toward those they perceive as typical members of their place-based in-group, these affective evaluations critically depend on whether individuals themselves align with the stereotypes in question. Overall, these findings provide systematic evidence on stereotyping along the urban–rural divide. By way of that, they further underscore the importance of a social identity perspective to political divisions between urban and rural residents.
Conforming to Deviate: Public Support for Partisan Violence and the Interaction Between the Needs for Uniqueness and Belonging
Sofia Mumma
Full text
Although most partisans are averse to political violence against the outgroup a small, unique fringe can have disastrous political consequences, shaping political divisions and fueling more antagonistic conflict. Building on the social identity approach and optimal distinctiveness theory, this paper theorizes that a need for uniqueness and a need to belong can interact to fuel violent partisanship. Across two original cross-sectional U.S. surveys (total N = 3,447), I find that partisans can balance the needs for uniqueness and belonging by becoming superior conformers to the group, differentiating themselves by their elevated levels of prototypicality. Thus, this study finds that when one’s need to belong to their group is high, need for uniqueness leads to support for partisan violence. This work suggests a motivational perspective on partisan radicalization, examining the roots of social influence processes underlying partisan intra group dynamics. Depending on the group context at any given time, need for uniqueness and need to belong can impoverish or enrich democracy.

Political Geography

The politics of protection: Agricultural planning, legitimacy, and dissent in Richmond, Canada
Colin Dring, Lenore Newman, Hannah Wittman
Full text
A Postcolonial Schmitt? Ontology, ethnography, and “more-than-liberal” democracy
Benedikt Korf, Stephan Hochleithner
Full text
Climbing a paper mountain: Academic publishing at a critical juncture
Olivier Walther, Mia Bennett, Kate Coddington, Deirdre Conlon, Patricia Ehrkamp, Charis Enns, Christopher Lizotte, Filippo Menga, Caroline Nagel
Full text
Hydro-legal geopolitics: Why states join—or reject—global water treaties
Mohsen Nagheeby
Full text
Governing through temporariness: Disaster, temporal governmentality, and refugee agency in the Rohingya camps
Nazifa Rafa
Full text
The price of climate finance: Agency, knowledge and refusal in Mexico
Miriam Gay-Antaki
Full text
Degrowing desire
Robert Fletcher
Full text
Spaces of private conservation: State effects and hierarchical autonomy in private wildlife conservation
Marlotte de Jong, Bilal Butt, Omolade Adunbi
Full text
Extractivism, ecocentrism and democracy. Imaginaries around rights of river and legal personhood of the RhĂŽne River
Cyrille Vallet
Full text
Dispossessed geographies: Statelessness and eco-resistance in Rojhelat
Ahmad Mohammadpour
Full text
Placing disability front and centre in political geography
David A. Alexander
Full text
The Lithium Road. Political practices in favor of extractive infrastructures in the Bolivian Altiplano.
David Schröter, Felipe Fernåndez, Alke Jenss
Full text
After the Embankment: Climate change and the politics of infrastructural unmaking
Kasia Paprocki
Full text
Migration governance in border towns: Trajectories of local border governance in Trieste and Messina
Chiara Milan, Federico Alagna
Full text
Troubling ‘Post-Neoliberalism’: Coalitional governance and contradiction in Chicago
Keavy McFadden
Full text
The fiction of disaster: Forest fires and state-making in the Indian Himalaya
Kapil Yadav
Full text
Transnational party activism: why do migrants become active in political parties from their country of origin?
Nicolas Fliess
Full text
Artificial snow and dry river-acequias: Contesting the River-grabbing geography in the DĂ­lar and Monachil Rivers, Spain
Ana MarĂ­a ArbelĂĄez-Trujillo, Carolina Cuevas Parra, MarĂ­a Aguilar- Soto
Full text

Political Psychology

When are identity‐based groups harmful to democracy? Victimized majority narratives and Muslim groups in Indonesia
Nathanael Gratias Sumaktoyo, Jessica Soedirgo
Full text
When are identity‐based groups harmful to democracy? We argue that identity‐based groups become harmful to democracy when they engage in and promote victimized majority narratives—portraying the majority as being removed from power and sidelined by minority groups. We support this argument through a mixed‐method approach and by analyzing Muslim groups in Indonesia. Through interviews with leaders of moderate and hardliner Muslim groups, we show that the narratives are more prevalent in the latter than the former type of groups, even though the groups may hold similar views on other issues such as the question of heterodoxy and blasphemy. We then test this argument at the individual level using original panel data of identifiers of Muslim groups, showing that identifying with hardliner groups—but not the moderate groups—correlates with higher support for political Islam, higher religious intolerance, and higher support for religious violence.
“With all these feelings, I just can't stay passive”: A qualitative exploration of eco‐emotions, political perception, perceived injustice and pro‐environmental behaviors among young adults in France
Arnaud Sapin, AnaĂŻs Ameline, Susan Clayton, Valisoa Bujard, HĂ©lĂšne Jalin, Ghozlane Fleury‐Bahi
Full text
Recent studies have highlighted the emotions individuals may experience in response to environmental crises, particularly climate anxiety. Despite a growing literature investigating eco‐emotions, further research is needed to identify the associated appraisals–especially moral constructs. This study qualitatively explores young adults' perspectives on environmental crisis, particularly looking at how environmental injustice and perception of political stakeholders are linked to specific emotions. It also examines how eco‐emotions may drive self‐reported pro‐environmental actions. Thirty French young adults (18–29) were interviewed. Sadness and anger were associated with injustice, while diverse emotions were associated with various political stakeholders: Anger was associated with institutions and “other people,” hope to non‐governmental organizations and anxiety to the media. The study also found that for two thirds of respondents, emotions appear to drive action, with positive emotions (hope, joy) and negative emotions (anxiety, anger and sadness) both having considerable influence. Among other elements, this study highlights how individuals' perception of different political stakeholders leads to a better understanding of their eco‐emotions. It also shows that positive emotions can be an equally significant driver of action as negative emotions.
Depressive symptoms and populism: Evidence from European countries
Nathalie Herren, Markus Freitag, Daniel Auer, Chantal Hofstetter
Full text
In recent years, depression has entered the research agenda of political psychology, emerging as a meaningful psychological correlate of diverse political attitudes and behaviors. Surprisingly, however, its link to populism—the political phenomenon that has probably attracted most public and scholarly attention over the past several years—has not yet been studied. We address this notable blind spot and provide a first exploratory evaluation of the relationship between depressive symptoms and the inclination to populism. To do so, we make use of two European datasets (CRONOS‐2 and ESS 11) that include a validated, epidemiological short scale to measure depressive symptoms (CES‐D8) and allow us to consider both populist attitudes and populist voting as key individual‐level manifestations of populism. Our analyses show that individuals experiencing depressive symptoms tend to exhibit a stronger affinity for populist ideas and are more likely to support populist parties. Our study thus underlines the importance of prevention, early detection, and treatment measures targeting the widespread “black dog” of depression—also in the interest of preserving and promoting democratic health.

Political Science Research and Methods

Voting for gender balancing? The effect of a multiple-vote system on women’s representation
Yoshikuni Ono, Hirofumi Miwa, Yuko Kasuya
Full text
Does permitting voters to select multiple candidates in majoritarian elections increase diversity among those elected? While majoritarian systems typically use single-vote ballots, research suggests that allowing multiple selections may increase the representation of women and racial minorities. However, empirical evidence regarding actual voter behavior remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a survey experiment that varied the number of selectable candidates from one to three in multimember local elections. The results revealed that, under the multiple-vote condition, respondents were more likely to alternate by gender, particularly in their second- and third-ranked choices, supporting the theory that multiple voting fosters more diverse representation. Nevertheless, men often emerged as the first-ranked choice, giving them an overall advantage at the aggregate level.

PS: Political Science & Politics

If You Build It, Will They Learn? Using the Learning Management System to Measure Engagement and Impact
Matthew B. Platt
Full text
This study uses the learning management system (LMS) to track student engagement with a pedagogical intervention in a research methods course. The data were collected over 10 semesters to gauge whether students accessed the supplemental learning materials and whether those materials impacted their learning. I find that although the level of engagement and its effectiveness were mixed and varied by semester, engaging more with the supplemental materials did improve student performance overall. This research emphasizes the importance of measuring whether our interventions even reach their intended targets (i.e., students) and demonstrates the utility of the LMS as a data-collection tool for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning research.

Public Choice

Welfare state and natives’ preferences for immigrants’ types
Daiki Kishishita, Tomoko Matsumoto
Full text
Lobbying and rotating leadership
Philippe van Gruisen
Full text
Economic and political decisions are increasingly made in international organizations (IOs). A distinctive feature of many IOs is that they operate under a system of rotating leadership (e.g. a committee chair that rotates annually). Despite the widespread use of such systems and their potential value to interest groups, we know surprisingly little about how interest groups respond to rotating leadership in IOs. Using both micro- and macro-level data on the economic performance of commercial lobbyists in the European Union, I show that interest groups respond strategically to short-term shifts in leadership. Specifically, when a country takes over the rotating EU Council Presidency, interest groups increase their use of commercial lobbyists to gain access to policymakers from the presiding country.

Research & Politics

Who fears which great power? Symmetric and asymmetric threat perceptions in East Asia
Kiyoung Chang, Jeeyoung Park
Full text
Public threat perceptions in East Asia do not map neatly onto aggregate power or generalized rivalry sentiment, yet their cross-domain structure has received little systematic attention. This article examines how concerns across distinct issue domains are associated with perceived threats from China and the United States, distinguishing between symmetric domains, in which responsibility for managing a problem is plausibly shared by both powers, and asymmetric domains, in which responsibility is more closely tied to one. Using original cross-national survey data, we estimate seemingly unrelated regressions that jointly model the two threat outcomes. Concern about North Korea’s nuclear program is associated with higher perceived threat from both powers across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, while climate concern shows a similar pattern in Japan and South Korea but not in Taiwan. By contrast, belief that COVID-19 was man-made is more strongly associated with China-threat perceptions, whereas dissatisfaction with Japan’s historical apologies is more closely linked to U.S.-threat perceptions in Japan and South Korea, with different substantive meanings in the two countries. The findings indicate that responsibility distributions across issue domains organize public threat perceptions and shape the domestic terrain of alignment politics under great-power rivalry.