I checked 15 psychology journals on Tuesday, July 07, 2026 using the Crossref API. For the period June 30 to July 06, I found 106 new paper(s) in 14 journal(s).

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Mapping Methodological Variation in Experience-Sampling Research From Design to Data Analysis: A Systematic Review
Lisa Peeters, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Marie Annelise Blanchard, Marie Suenaert, Gudrun Eisele, Olivia J. Kirtley, Richard Artner, Ginette Lafit
Full text
The experience-sampling method (ESM) has become a widespread tool to study time-varying constructs across many subfields of psychological and psychiatric research. Variety in subfields of research and constructs of interest has contributed to considerable methodological variation. Therefore, in this systematic review, we aimed to (a) describe the methodological variation in ESM-study designs and (b) assess the transparency (i.e., reporting and open-science practices) of ESM studies. We developed an extensive list of data-extraction items covering the entire workflow of an ESM study, from conception of the research question to reporting the results. These data were extracted from 150 recently published articles describing 162 studies applying ESM in the field of psychology and psychiatry. As expected, variation was observed for every methodological decision. Some findings aligned with previous syntheses of the literature (e.g., a median study duration of 10 days, a majority of studies including convenience samples of the general population, the high prevalence of multilevel modeling). Regarding other decisions, this review was able to provide new insights (e.g., questionnaire length and content often varied between and/or within participants, average sample sizes have increased over time). Transparency in reporting and open-science practices seem to have improved in recent years, but there is room for further development of awareness and guidance. This broad overview of ESM research serves as a first step toward a broader goal to improve the methodological quality of ESM research in psychology, contributing to a more rigorous, credible science of daily life.
Simulation Intervention for Cross-Sectional Network Models: Based on the R Packages NodeIdentifyR and NIRApost
Fei Wang, Yiming Wu, Yibo Wu, Tingshao Zhu
Full text
Traditional cross-sectional network-centrality metrics fail to distinguish causal directions between symptoms, leading to biases in selecting potential intervention targets. The nodeIdentifyR algorithm (NIRA) addresses this issue by using simulation-based interventions to identify projected optimal intervention target in cross-sectional networks. However, existing applications of NIRA typically overlook several recommended validation steps, which may reduce the robustness of its results. Specifically, a critical prerequisite for applying NIRA, testing for moderation effects to ensure the invariance of edge weights during simulated intervention, is consistently ignored. Moreover, they lack statistical significance testing for simulated intervention effects through permutation tests and stability assessment of NIRA outcomes via repeated simulations. In this article, we introduce the extended R package NIRApost , which supplements NIRA with these three recommended complementary procedures. We provide a comprehensive R tutorial demonstrating the implementation of both NIRA and these validation steps. Researchers applying NIRA are advised to conduct moderation-effect testing as a prerequisite, followed by permutation tests and stability analyses to ensure robust and interpretable findings. Upon completing this tutorial, readers are capable of properly applying NIRA and its validation procedures in their own data analyses.

Behavior Research Methods

Generative psychometrics via AI-GENIE: Automatic item generation and validation with network-integrated evaluation
Lara L. Russell-Lasalandra, Alexander P. Christensen, Hudson Golino
Full text
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), has introduced powerful tools for various research domains, including psychological scale development. This study presents a methodology for efficiently generating and selecting high-quality, non-redundant items for psychological assessments using LLMs and network psychometrics. Our approach, termed Automatic Item Generation and Validation with Network-Integrated Evaluation (AI-GENIE), reduces reliance on expert intervention by integrating generative AI with the latest network psychometric techniques. The efficacy of AI-GENIE was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations using the Mixtral, Gemma 2, Llama 3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4o models to generate item pools that mimic Big Five personality assessments. Additionally, items from AI-GENIE were empirically tested with five nationally representative U.S. samples ( $$N = 4{,}964$$ N = 4 , 964 total), demonstrating that AI-GENIE-generated scales achieve structural validity—that is, evidence based on internal structure (dimensionality and item stability)—comparable to traditional expert-developed measures. The results demonstrated improvements in item selection efficiency, with overall average increases of 8.68–20.03 in normalized mutual information in the final item pool across all models. We also present a simulation study on the emerging construct of AI anxiety to demonstrate AI-GENIE’s utility for underrepresented constructs. Results from newly released models (DeepSeek, GPT-OSS 20B, GPT-OSS 120B) are presented in the Appendix. The findings suggest that AI-GENIE can streamline the scale development and structural validation process.
Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs
Yilan Chen, Hongyun Liu
Full text
Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization
Yixiao Dong, Deodatta Baral, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas
Full text
While some are neutral, many psychological constructs (e.g., depression, learning motivation, or antisocial behavior) carry clear directional expectations that align with social or ethical principles and values. When a construct is framed with the goal of moving toward its socially desirable direction, it becomes a meaningful psychological objective to pursue. People pursue different objectives in their daily lives, sometimes simultaneously. During this process, tradeoffs occur when objectives are in tension or conflict (e.g., speed and accuracy in problem-solving), meaning they cannot be consistently improved without compromising one another. While certain psychological tradeoffs have been well studied, others remain underexplored or possibly even unidentified. One critical reason is that mainstream analytic methods used in psychological research are not designed to investigate such tradeoffs. Fortunately, a suitable method has long existed in other disciplines. Pareto optimization (PO) is an effective analytic framework widely applied in fields such as biology, economics, and engineering to investigate tradeoffs among multiple competing objectives. In this tutorial, we review the core conceptual and methodological foundations of PO and aim to bring this classic method to a psychological audience. Moreover, we develop a user-friendly R Shiny application (named PO-Run) for conducting PO analyses and adapt the Marginal Rate of Substitution Index from econometrics to quantify psychological tradeoffs. The application can be accessed via https://paretooptimization.shinyapps.io/Pareto/ , and its utility is further illustrated through a real-world psychological example. Methodological considerations, guidance for using results, and future directions for advancing the PO method are discussed.
Are 7-point Likert scales preferable to 5-point scales in language research?
Marc Brysbaert
Full text
A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology
Zhicheng Lin
Full text
QualGames: A Qualtrics implementation and a database of behavioral game theory tasks
Shengchuang Feng, Nadhilla Melia, Akshay Abraham, Yuan Ni Chan, Li Ling Lee, Jia Ying Pei, Hui Shan Yap, David Hung, John Suckling, Chew Lee Teo, Trevor Robbins, Barbara Sahakian, Zoe Kourtzi, Victoria Leong, Annabel Chen, Henriette Hendriks, Georgios Christopoulos, character(0)
Full text
PyLossless: A non-destructive EEG processing pipeline
Scott Huberty, James Desjardins, Tyler Collins, Mayada Elsabbagh, Christian O’Reilly
Full text
EEG recordings are typically long and contain large amounts of data, making manual cleaning a time-consuming and error-prone task. Automated preprocessing pipelines can facilitate the efficient and objective extraction of artifacts, enabling standardized and reproducible analyses. However, automated preprocessing pipelines typically remove data considered artifacts and return a subset of irreversibly transformed signals. This approach obfuscates preprocessing decisions and often makes it impossible to recover the original data or modify the preprocessing steps. Further, it complicates collaboration among research teams working on a common dataset, as different analyses may require specific preprocessing steps. Given the large amount of resources devoted to collecting EEG, tools that can efficiently and transparently preprocess data are greatly needed. PyLossless addresses this need by creating a non-destructive, automated preprocessing pipeline that maintains the continuous EEG structure. It offers a user-friendly API, is well documented, tested through continuous integration, easily deployable, and integrates with the popular MNE-Python environment. The pipeline also provides a browser-based quality control review (QCR) dashboard that allows researchers to visualize and edit automated artifact flags for sensors, time periods, and independent components. The end product of PyLossless is a lossless annotated data state that can be shared and used with analysis-specific artifact rejection policies, allowing for an optimal balance between flexibility and standardization.
“It makes sense to me”: Examining data file column names in the visual cognitive literature
Giovanna C. Del Sordo, Haden Dewis, Peter T. Darch, Michael C. Hout, Hayward J. Godwin
Full text

Computers in Human Behavior

Mindfulness Training in Virtual Reality for Borderline Personality Disorder symptoms: An Analogue Study
Yaren Chakmak, Crescent Jicol, Karin Petrini
Full text
Is Faking It the New Making It?: Exploring Virtual Influencers’ Effectiveness in Depression Campaign
Rachel X. Peng
Full text
The impact of affordances for emotional human–chatbot interaction on users’ willingness to self-disclose
Xu Zengzhan, Lei Mingpeng
Full text
The work-related consequences of employees’ media-based political information consumption: A nine-wave weekly study during the 2024 U.S. presidential primary season
Ian M. Hughes, Nathan A. Bowling, Melissa G. Keith, Rebecca M. Brossoit, Andrea Bazzoli
Full text
Uncanny Valley: Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Vulnerability to Influence by Artificial Intelligence-Generated Images Online
Neil Shortland, Katelyn Smith
Full text
Digital Exploitation and Vulnerability: A Study of Online Exploited Personalities
Dylan Hamza
Full text
Offline friendship conflict and adolescent Internet addiction: Indirect associations via self-esteem and the moderating role of clique-level norms
Yanli Hou, Ruonan Guo, Shengcheng Song, Caina Li
Full text
Virtual peers reduce gambling symptoms and related problems of moderate-risk gamblers: A randomized controlled trial
Kenji Yokotani, Yosuke Seki, Nobuhito Abe, Masahiro Takamura, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Hideyuki Takahashi
Full text
AI chatbots in mental Health: How emojis, prompt type, and interactivity shape user perceptions in the United States and China
Jihye Lee, Zinan Darren Yang, Weijia Shi, Yan Liu
Full text
Evaluating user performance with RAG-based generative AI: A scenario-based experiment on AI-assisted information retrieval
Aktilek Sagynbayeva, Ajin Pyo, Sang-Hyeak Yoon, Sung-Byung Yang
Full text
Multimodal imaging and transcriptomics reveal the pathway of mindfulness-mediated recovery in internet gaming disorder
Xuefeng Xu, Huabin Wang, Shaoyu Cui, Haosen Ni, Guang-Heng Dong
Full text
Interdisciplinary perspectives and current findings on the role of trust as a psychological mediator in human interaction with artificial intelligence: Editorial overview
Irene Valori, Johannes Kraus, Merle T. Fairhurst
Full text
Blissful (A)Ignorance: Despite the widespread adoption of AI in communication, people do not suspect AI use in realistic contexts
Jiaqi Zhu, Andras Molnar
Full text
Mental health during war: Social media use and protective factors among adolescents and young adults
Yael Malin, Yaeli Gardyn, Christa S.C. Asterhan
Full text
Brain responses to deepfakes and real videos of emotional facial expressions reveal detection without awareness
Casey Becker, Russell Conduit, Philippe A. Chouinard, Robin Laycock
Full text

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

You Can (Not) Play with Us: Conspiracy Theories, Media, and Ostracism
Ani Baghumyan, Tobias Rohrbach, Silke Adam
Full text
This study examines the social impact of political conspiracy theories, focusing on how media exposure and individual predispositions lead to negative spillover effects on unrelated outgroups. Using an online survey experiment ( N = 1,973), we test how media coverage of a fictitious conspiracy theory alleging malicious actions by a foreign government affects participants’ willingness to ostracize a secondary outgroup: the uninvolved citizens of the same country. We also assess the role of conspiracy mentality. We first exposed participants to one-sided full debunking, two-sided partial debunking, or neutral coverage of the alleged conspiracy, and then measured their willingness to ostracize the secondary outgroup through self-reports, a list experiment, and a Cyberball game. We found that although media exposure type did not significantly affect ostracism overall, significant interaction emerged among participants high in conspiracy mentality. For this group, one-sided full debunking increased ostracism relative to other conditions. Conspiracy mentality also consistently predicted ostracism across all measures. Our findings highlight the potential backfire effects of certain debunking styles for specific audiences and underscore the importance of individual predispositions in shaping behavioral responses to conspiracy theory coverage.
Shifting Demographics, Shifting Perceptions: How Race and Politics Shape Reactions to the Majority-Minority Future
Deborah J. Wu, Stylianos Syropoulos, Andrea Y. J. Mah, Kyle F. Law, Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon, Ezra M. Markowitz, Tatishe M. Nteta, Allecia E. Reid, Joel C. Ginn, Se Min Suh, Liane Young, Brian Lickel
Full text
Racial minorities are expected to be a majority of the U.S. population by 2044. We examined predictors of Americans’ perceptions towards this racial demographic shift (RDS), how accurately they estimate others’ perceptions, and whether an intervention corrects people’s misperceptions. In Study 1, in a nationally representative sample ( N = 1,600), most Republicans, Independents, and Democrats viewed the RDS as neutral or good. Being White, conservative, a 2020 Donald Trump voter, endorsing minimization of racism, and endorsing competitive and dangerous worldviews predicted more negative perceptions. Meanwhile, having racially diverse social networks and positive feelings for racial minorities predicted more positive perceptions. In Study 2, a preregistered Prolific experiment ( N = 819), Republicans underestimated other Republicans’ and Democrats’ perceptions of this shift. An information-based intervention corrected this, with this effect persisting 1 week later, albeit weaker. Our research suggests that emphasizing more positive ingroup perceptions of the RDS may help correct misperceptions and increase support for racial diversity.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Replication and extension of Carlson and Zaki (2018): Do lay theories of altruism apply equally to all actors?
Ashley Harrell, Margaret L. Traeger
Full text
Incentivization very weakly improves theory of mind: A multi-sample investigation and meta-analysis
Tomer Paz-Fitussy, Eldad Yechiam
Full text
Gossip or confrontation? Sanctioning environmental norm violations and the reputation of punishers
Xiyan Song, Catherine Molho, Paul A.M. Van Lange
Full text
Playing it safe: Negotiators avoid uncertainty and reach safer, but less integrative agreements
Marco Schauer, Johann M. Majer, Caroline Heydenbluth, Roman Trötschel
Full text
Learning to distrust: One trust experience changes the expected value of trust
Annabelle R. Roberts, Emma E. Levine, Jane L. Risen
Full text
Two wrongs is what makes it more right: How retaliatory incivility receives social leniency
Merrick R. Osborne, Suhaib Abdurahman, Ali Omrani, Jackson P. Trager, Morteza Dehghani
Full text
Holiday greeting inclusivity in organizations: The more the merrier
Erica L. Granz Nack, Kimberly Rios
Full text
Registered report stage I: Defending or defying democracy? Investigating the relationship between conspiracy beliefs and support for democratic principles [registered report - stage I]
Tisa Bertlich, Felicitas Flade, Roland Imhoff
Full text
Managing threatened identities across everyday situations
N. Derek Brown, Drew S. Jacoby-Senghor, Allyson P. Mackey, Michael L. Slepian
Full text
Just a means to an end? Individuals support direct democracy instrumentally, irrespective of conspiracy mentality
Tisa Bertlich, Fiona Kazarovytska, Roland Imhoff
Full text
Tracking connections, not content: How working memory shapes content and social learning in online networks
Esther Kang, Arun Lakshmanan
Full text
Minority report: How minorities' awareness of power asymmetry drives strategic preparation in opinion debates
Alain Quiamzade, Fanny Lalot, Dominic Abrams
Full text
Not all stimuli are conditioned equal – Larger evaluative conditioning effects for fluent stimuli
Claudine Pulm, Anne Gast
Full text
Smiling your way to happiness or misery? Experimental tests of competing perspectives
Nicholas A. Coles, Annabel Dang, Joao Francisco Goes Braga Takayanagi
Full text
When rightness is wrong: Chronic prevention orientation predicts cardiovascular threat responses under regulatory fit
Deborah E. Ward, Mark D. Seery, Thomas L. Saltsman, Cheryl L. Kondrak
Full text
Beyond morality primacy: Inference of competence takes the lead in spontaneous impressions
Irmak Olcaysoy Okten, Xi Shen, Ayanna Brewton
Full text
Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement
Rodrigo Furst, Yan Vieites, Bernardo Andretti
Full text
The effect of frameswitching on perceptions of decisiveness, creativity, and job fit
Sabrina Piccolo, AnalĂ­a Albuja
Full text
The spread of fear: Perceptual deindividuation drives racial bias in threat generalization
Arshiya Aggarwal, Julia R. Hopkins, Dana E. Diaz, Kalina J. Michalska, Nicholas P. Camp, Brent L. Hughes
Full text
Does ignorance love company? The social dynamics of information avoidance
Katharina Reher, Martin Götz, Filippo Toscano, Jörg Gross
Full text
Decision strategy and perceived humanness: The roles of decision context and decision outcome
Hong Zhang, Huan Zhu, Jingyan Wang, Yima Jin
Full text
Strategically prosocial: Using acts of kindness to secure more valuable interaction partners
Luuk L. Snijder, Mirre Stallen, Jörg Gross, Carsten K.W. De Dreu
Full text
Trust under watch: Relational models and the context-dependent nature of monitoring
Anna O. Kuzminska, Maryam Khan, Pelin Kesebir, Tomasz Zaleskiewicz, Agata Gasiorowska
Full text
The effects of anonymity in volunteer's dilemmas
Yukari Jessica Tham, Yohsuke Ohtsubo, Kaori Karasawa
Full text
Why do people dislike gender role violators? A test of three models
Alan J. Lambert, Fade R. Eadeh, Svyatoslav Prokhorets, Giselle Gisser, Keralyn Siebrass
Full text
Is a random human peer better than a highly supportive chatbot in reducing loneliness over time?
Ruo-Ning Li, Dunigan Folk, Abhay Singh, Lyle Ungar, Elizabeth Dunn
Full text
Common = ineffective? A replication attempt of the normative dilution effect in the context of political apologies
Vlada Trofimchuk, Rebecca Littman
Full text
Beyond confronting: Cultivating inclusion through proactive Allyship
Lucy De Souza, Toni Schmader
Full text
Using intersectional implicit association measures does not consistently improve the predictive validity of the implicit association test
Jeffrey To, Jordan Axt
Full text
Beliefs versus reality: People overestimate the actual dishonesty of others
Jareef Martuza, Helge ThorbjÞrnsen, Hallgeir SjÄstad
Full text
Multiculturalism shapes moral judgments of sexist men across religious groups
Alexandra VĂĄzquez, Beatriz Alba
Full text
Interpersonal synchrony modulates explicit and implicit self-other blurring: Evidence from an IAT
Manisha Biswas, Marcel Brass
Full text
More is more, or is there more to it? Frequency moderations in evaluative conditioning depend on variation in the unconditioned stimuli
Mandy HĂŒtter, Kathrin Reichmann, Dana Höffler, Marco Denin
Full text
When society feels broken: How perceptions of anomie shape donation tendencies across cultures
Fei Gao, Lan Xia
Full text
Approach-avoidance action tendencies: A replicable approach/avoidance compatibility effect can be found when valence is task irrelevant
Yoann Julliard, Cédric Batailler, François Ric, Marine Rougier, Maude Tagand, Mae Braud, Dominique Muller
Full text

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Belief in a diversity–meritocracy trade-off.
Evan P. Apfelbaum, Eileen Y. Suh, Yue Wu
Full text
Trust and trust funds: How others’ childhood and current social class context influence trust behavior and expectations.
Kristin Laurin, Holly R. Engstrom, Toni Schmader, Khai Qing Chua, Nadav Klein, Stéphane CÎté
Full text
Finding agreement: Functional magnetic resonance imaging hyperscanning reveals that mental state space exploration facilitates opinion alignment.
Sebastian P. H. Speer, Haran Sened, Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, Lily Tsoi, Shannon M. Burns, Emily B. Falk, Diana I. Tamir
Full text
Do people across the world want to remember positive ingroup histories?
Fiona Kazarovytska, Katrín Árnadóttir, Silvana D'Ottone, Slieman Halabi, Edward Clarke, Suryodaya Sharma, Verena Heidrich, Roland Imhoff
Full text
Dynamic networks of social contact, social desire, and affect across time scales.
Michael D. KrÀmer, Bernd Schaefer, Yannick Roos, David Richter, Cornelia Wrzus
Full text
The unexpected importance of expectations in self-conscious emotions.
Jessica L. Tracy, Gabrielle C. Ibasco
Full text
Patterns and sources of life satisfaction stability and change at different developmental stages.
Marco Deppe, Charlotte K. L. Dißelkamp, Andreas J. Forstner, Christian Kandler
Full text
The dispositional basis of selective prosociality.
BĂŒsra Elif Yelbuz, Isabel Thielmann
Full text
Exploring the socioeconomic pattern of humans’ future orientation: A multimethod multistudy approach.
Alejandro Díaz-Guerra, Mirko Antino, Rafael Caballero, Alfredo Rodríguez-Muñoz, Alejandro Våsquez-Echeverría
Full text

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package
James W. Baurley, Carolyn M. Ervin, Katie Witkiewitz, Eric Claus, Matt Levy, Christopher S. McMahan
Full text

Organizational Research Methods

Argument Mining for Organizational Research: A Computer-Aided Analysis of Organizational Talk
Cornelia Fedtke, Gregor Wiedemann, Cristina Besio
Full text
Argument mining—the automatic identification, classification, and linking of argumentative text—has been studied in natural language processing (NLP) for more than a decade. Despite its claimed potential for applications in legal, political, and social contexts, it remained largely unexplored in organizational research. This article introduces aspect-based argument mining (ABAM) as a methodical innovation for studying how organizations justify decisions, construct legitimacy, and relate to their environments through communicative acts. By scaling up the analysis of argumentative structures beyond the limits of small-scale, qualitative studies, ABAM enables the recognition and systematic analysis of argumentation patterns in large text corpora that were hardly detectable with previous (computational) approaches. The potential is demonstrated by a longitudinal case study of Twitter debates on nuclear energy in Germany, revealing how shifting societal values—particularly the reframing of nuclear energy from a safety to a climate issue—produced growing misalignments between organizational talk of a political party organization and its social media environment.
A Multimodal Item Response Modeling for Personality Assessment in Organizational Research
Dongbo Tu, Fumei Zhang, Siwei Peng, Daxun Wang, Yan Cai
Full text
Recent advances in process data collection have made it possible to efficiently collect multimodal behavioral indicators, such as response times and eye-tracking measures. These multimodal data have been widely applied in cognitive and achievement assessments, where they have improved the accuracy of latent construct estimation. However, the use of informative multimodal process data in noncognitive assessments, such as personality measures widely used in organizational research, has received considerably less attention. To address this gap, we integrate response time and eye-tracking data into a conventional item response model to capture respondents’ response processes, thereby improving differentiation across trait levels and enhancing noncognitive assessment. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model and compare it with a conventional IRT model. Results indicate that model parameters can be accurately recovered and that incorporating multimodal data significantly improves the accuracy of person latent trait estimates. Finally, an empirical analysis was conducted to demonstrate the applicability and advantages of the proposed model in personality assessment.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Metacognitive and Interpersonal Intellectual Humility Are Asymmetrically Associated with Well-Being
Michael M. Prinzing, Shauna M. Bowes, Karen Melton, Perry Glanzer, Sarah Schnitker
Full text
Intellectual humility, lauded as an important intellectual virtue, is theorized to encompass metacognitive tendencies (i.e., appreciation of the limits of one’s knowledge and intellectual abilities) and interpersonal ones (i.e., appreciation of others’ knowledge and intellectual abilities). Although prior research has investigated potential epistemic benefits, it remains unclear whether intellectual humility is personally beneficial—that is, conducive to individuals’ well-being. Two main studies and one supplemental study (total N = 4,049) tested for associations cross-sectionally, within and between persons, and in longitudinal changes over 2 years. Results indicated that, whereas interpersonal intellectual humility is associated with better well-being, metacognitive intellectual humility is generally associated with worse. These findings highlight the importance of the distinction between these two forms of intellectual humility, align with theoretical work on the determinants of well-being, and have implications for intellectual humility’s status as a virtue and for efforts to encourage people to cultivate intellectual humility.

Psychological Bulletin

Does the variance of personality traits change across the lifespan? A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies.
Peter Haehner, Susanne Buecker, Marco J. Altorfer, Vera V. Bocklet, Wiebke Bleidorn
Full text

Psychological Methods

Addressing selective reporting bias in meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes: A tutorial in R.
Man Chen, James E. Pustejovsky
Full text
Heterogeneous variance models with Gaussian processes.
Yvette Baurne, Frédéric Delmar, Jonas Wallin
Full text

Psychological Science

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants
Erik L. Knight, Gideon Nave, Steven D. Shaw, Coren Apicella, Pierre L. Bonin, Anna Dreber, Shawn N. Geniole, Magnus Johannesson, Dylan Manfredi, Pranjal Mehta, Valentina Proietti, Steven J. Stanton, Francesca R. Luberti, Triana Ortiz, Justin M. Carré
Full text
The cognitive reflection test (CRT) measures reliance on intuitive thinking versus deliberate reasoning and predicts important real-world outcomes. Prior research has suggested that testosterone administration impaired CRT performance, but follow-up studies produced null results. To provide a rigorous test, we conducted a large, preregistered, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment, unprecedented in size, with 1,000 adult men, as part of an adversarial collaboration. Participants received a single dose of intranasal testosterone or placebo, completed the CRT, and rated their confidence level. We found an insignificant treatment effect on the CRT, with the point estimate in the opposite direction of the original hypothesis (ÎČ LOGIT = 0.118, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−0.099, 0.335]). In a second primary test, we found a significant negative treatment effect on confidence (ÎČ LOGIT = −0.329, 95% CI = [−0.558, −0.100]), which is also the opposite of our prediction. Our findings challenge earlier claims about testosterone’s cognitive effects and highlight the importance of high-powered replications. Long-term or developmental testosterone effects remain potentially important but difficult to study.
Boosting Media Literacy Using Lateral Reading and Online Search Interventions
Lisa Oswald, Anastasia Kozyreva, Stefan M. Herzog, Pietro Leonardo Nickl, Ralph Hertwig
Full text
Empowering people to navigate online information competently is essential to complement systemic content moderation and platform regulation. A nationally representative randomized controlled study among adults in Germany ( N = 2,666) compared two media-literacy interventions: a source-focused lateral-reading strategy to help participants distinguish trustworthy from untrustworthy news outlets, and a claim-focused search strategy to help them assess the credibility of specific claims. Both interventions showed small improvements in discernment, but not all effects were statistically distinguishable from zero. At a 2-week follow-up, discernment improved in all groups, and differences between the intervention and control groups were no longer statistically distinguishable. We found no evidence of backfire effects. An exploratory analysis of discernment pretreatment indicated the lowest performance for supporters of populist radical-right parties. Behavioral measures suggested increases in information search in both intervention groups. On average, lateral reading reduced trust in untrustworthy sources, and online search increased trust in trustworthy sources.
A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations
Edward H. Chang, Erika L. Kirgios, Cansin Arslan
Full text
Accountability is a commonly recommended intervention to reduce discrimination. However, there have been no field experiments testing whether it reduces discrimination in workplaces. Here we present preregistered analyses of a field experiment conducted at a company ( n = 3,266 managers rating 17,149 employees) testing whether an accountability intervention reduces performance-evaluation gaps between White and racial-minority employees. We did not find evidence that the accountability intervention closes evaluation gaps. These null effects are likely not driven by a lack of statistical power or by inattentive managers, nor is the manipulation ineffective in all contexts—a supplemental online experiment shows that similar treatment language does change decision-making, underscoring a disconnect between findings in hypothetical settings versus real organizations. These results highlight the need for additional field experiments and theorizing to better understand when and why accountability interventions, as they may typically be implemented in organizations, improve diversity-related outcomes.
Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children’s Learning?
Mengqi Hu, Wenbo Zhao, Meiyuan Cao, David R. Shanks, Xiao Hu, Liang Luo, Chunliang Yang
Full text
Does overconfidence really confer adaptive benefits to children’s learning? Through a tripartite investigation involving a preregistered replication (Study 1; N = 30, children aged 6–8 years), computational simulation (Study 2), and an experimental intervention (Study 3; N = 64, children aged 6–8 years), we first replicated previous findings that highly overconfident (HO) children exhibited less negative performance change across a memory task than their low-overconfidence (LO) counterparts. However, this pattern was driven by participant-selection bias and regression-to-the-mean effects rather than by adaptive benefits of childhood overconfidence. When experimentally manipulating children’s overconfidence levels to eliminate these methodological drawbacks, the difference in performance changes between HO and LO children disappeared. These findings challenge an influential hypothesis about the adaptive nature of childhood overconfidence, underscore the risks of median-split designs with difference scores, highlight the necessity of causal experimental approaches in developmental research, and raise concerns about educational practices promoting positive illusions in children.

Psychology of Popular Media

The “ideal” body according to artificial intelligence: Body image implications for athletes and nonathletes.
Delaney E. Thibodeau, Sasha M. Gollish, Jessica E. Boyes, Edina Bijvoet, Catherine M. Sabiston
Full text
Who stans celebrities on social media? The role of gender, sexual orientation, and political ideology.
Tara C. Marshall, Vania Wu, Zoya Pal
Full text
Keep your head in the game: Retrospective imaginative involvement with video game narratives.
Koji Yoshimura, Philippe de Villemor Chauveau
Full text
Children’s vocabulary, math, and social-emotional learning from interactive media: The role of choice, agency, and repetition in app design.
Allyson L. Snyder, Drew P. Cingel, Sofia V. Rhea, Jane Shawcroft, Samantha L. Vigil, Katherine Ong
Full text
The effects of memes on perceptions and decision making: Insights from fuzzy-trace theory.
Wylie Brace, Christopher R. Wolfe
Full text
Judging characters by their cover? Surface-level similarities, deep-level similarities, and parasocial relationships.
Bartosz G. ƻerebecki, Sizhe Dang, Nalini Jhinkoe-Rai, Bridget Schuiling, Julia Kneer
Full text
Uses of media representation in LGBTQ adults’ relationship with their parent: Individual, relational, and sociocultural contexts.
Y. Anthony Chen, Marie-Louise Mares
Full text
The “ideal versus real” social media posts increase female adults’ body appreciation.
Zhiying Liu, Ewa Miedzobrodzka, Jolanda Veldhuis
Full text
Exploring the impact of work from home on the effects of social media: A moderated mediation analysis of psychological well-being.
Biying Wu-Ouyang
Full text
Audiences on the dark side: Do antisocial personality traits predict motives for true crime listening?
Sofia V. Rhea, Laramie D. Taylor
Full text
Mental health disorders on Netflix: Analyzing stereotypes across 13 countries using the stereotype content model and machine learning.
Katharina Angermayr, Sebastian Scherr
Full text
Who will spend money uncontrollably in video games? The association between video game playing motivations and compulsive gaming buying among players of different genders.
Fang Xu, Ran Zhou, Gengfeng Niu, Min Cao, Xuan Xu, Huifen Shi, Zhen Zeng, Zongkui Zhou
Full text
Writing and reading fan fiction: The roles of self and social media.
Clara B. Rebello, Sonia Ghir, Kiana Reddock, Angelie Ignacio, Gerald C. Cupchik
Full text
Interrelational dynamics in problematic video game use: A network analysis.
Chloé Nguyen, Valentin Flaudias, Quentin Hallez
Full text
Association between gaming disorder and internalizing symptoms among children and adolescents: A child–parent dyadic study.
Toshitaka Hamamura, Kyosuke Kaneko, Masaya Ito
Full text
Double-tap or scroll away? The social costs of humblebragging on Instagram.
Ramzi Fatfouta, Michael Dufner
Full text
Developing and testing an explanatory model of complete mental health in tabletop role-playing games.
Patrick J. McLaren, Gavin R. Slemp, Ben Deery, Lindsay G. Oades
Full text
Video games are awesome: Understanding awe experiences in video games.
Ursula Thomson, Kongmeng Liew
Full text
The relationships between video games and cognitive, motor, emotional, and social development across the lifespan: An umbrella review.
Kevin Rebecchi, Chloé Nguyen, Quentin Hallez, Anna Rita Galiano
Full text
Can we separate the character from the creator? An exploratory study on parasocial relationships.
Kristina L. Howell, Meisam Vahedi, R. Chris Fraley
Full text
Weathering the storm: Grief and fan identity following the loss of a fan object.
Antonia Beatrice D. Lee
Full text
Do the traits of fictional crushes and real-life ideals align? An investigation into ideal standards based on fictional fandoms.
Nicole Zhi Min Wang, Ai Ni Teoh
Full text
The impact of acute and cumulative exposure to violent film on social cognition in university students.
Mary B. Ritchie, Carly T. Smith, Shannon A. H. Compton, Nathan Hostetler, Lindsay Oliver, Derek G. V. Mitchell
Full text

Technology, Mind, and Behavior

Smartphone use patterns and well-being among older adults: A screenomics study.
Yifei Su, Andrew Z. H. Yee, Guan Peng Loy, Edmund W. J. Lee
Full text