I checked 15 psychology journals on Thursday, October 22, 2026 using the Crossref API. For the period October 15 to October 21, I found 39 new paper(s) in 9 journal(s).

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

A Call for Greater Transparency in Piloting
Isaac J. Handley-Miner, Agata Bochynska, Brett Buttliere, Kai Li Chung, Mahmoud Elsherif, Christopher J. Graham, Neele Henriette Heiser, Hannah D. Loenneker, BjĂžrn SĂŠtrevik, Yashvin Seetahul, Justin Sulik, Johanna Tomczak, Caroline Zygar-Hoffmann, Mary Beth Neff
Full text
A pilot study is a preliminary investigation conducted before a full-scale research study. Although piloting is a common and valuable part of the research process, pilot studies are not systematically reported (or even acknowledged) in the psychology literature. In this article, we argue that establishing norms for regularly acknowledging preliminary research phases can improve many aspects of psychological research. Specifically, reporting pilot-study information can help researchers provide a more complete record of the research process, reveal selection biases in research designs that may affect the generalizability of findings, evaluate others’ research more accurately, learn from other researchers’ successes and failures, uphold ethical responsibilities, and improve the methodological practice of piloting. We conclude with three concrete suggestions for near-term changes to help pilot reporting become standard practice: Scientific communities and institutions should develop simple pilot-reporting templates, journals should provide clear pilot-reporting guidance for authors, and authors should acknowledge when pilot studies were run and share relevant materials and data. Current reporting standards favor conclusive and polished research narratives, but such narratives are the end product of a complex scientific process that should also be shared. A truly transparent science should spotlight processes, such as piloting, that underpin the conclusions scientific articles draw.
Restructuring Scientific Papers for Human and AI Readers
Zhicheng Lin
Full text
Scientific communication faces a dual crisis: Exponential publication growth—now accelerated by writing assisted by artificial intelligence (AI)—overwhelms human readers and reviewers, while fragmented evidence impedes automated synthesis. This fragmentation is especially acute in the behavioral and social sciences, where poorly standardized stimulus sets and jingle-jangle measurement fallacies (identical labels for distinct constructs; different labels for the same construct) hinder comparison, while underreported context conceals effect heterogeneity. Current AI tools can summarize papers but cannot reliably synthesize findings across incommensurable studies; they also risk perpetuating biases when trained on unstructured, unverified text. I propose restructuring scientific papers for two audiences: front-loaded narratives for time-pressed human readers, paired with research-object packages containing executable environments, semantic annotations, and tidy trial-level data. This design makes papers queryable: Readers can interrogate data and probe analytic choices, while the packages ground automated verification and AI-assisted manuscript evaluation—before submission or during peer review—in inspectable data and executable analyses rather than narrative claims alone. Such papers could become nodes in continuously updated evidence networks, automatically contributing effect sizes to living, versioned meta-analyses and allowing corrections and retractions to propagate through dependent syntheses. Widespread adoption will require institutions to credit research-object packages as scholarly contributions and invest in the open standards, infrastructure, training, and governance needed for their creation and long-term stewardship.
Registered Replication Report: Johns et al. (2005)
Andrea H. Stoevenbelt, Paulette C. Flore, Matus Adamkovic, Gabriel Banik, Rachel Bergers, Robert J. Calin-Jageman, Luis. A. Gomez, Joachim HĂŒffmeier, Megan N. Imundo, Scott D. Martin, Steven C. Pan, Lorraine A. T. Phillips, Jakob Pietschnig, Tilli Ripp, Jan Phillip RoĂ«r, Ivan Ropovik, Joyce Elena Schleu, Ann-Kathrin Torka, Bruno Verschuere, Martin Voracek, Luca Weiss, Jelte M. Wicherts
Full text
“Stereotype threat” refers to the fear of being judged based on negative stereotypes about the performance of a certain group one identifies with. Numerous published studies have found that stereotype threat might lower mathematics-test performance among women. However, many studies have used suboptimal designs and analyses, the literature might be subject to publication bias, and the cross-cultural generalizability of the effect remains unknown. In this registered replication report, we describe the result of nine direct replications (total N = 1,709) of a representative stereotype-threat study by Johns et al., who found that threatened women (but not men) underperform when they are confronted with a mathematics test that is presented to measure gender differences and that this effect can be alleviated by altering test instructions. A multilevel analysis showed no significant interaction effect between stereotype-threat condition and gender and an observed gender gap only on the mathematics test, in which women performed worse than men (Hedges’s g = −0.26, SE = 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [−0.47, −0.05]). The stereotype-threat effect among women was virtually null and not significant ( N = 1,275, g = 0.04, SE = 0.08, 95% CI = [−0.11, 0.20]) and considerably smaller than the original study ( N = 45, d = −0.82, 95% CI = [−1.45, −0.18]). Secondary analyses yielded a main effect of gender composition and a random effect of lab on mathematics-test performance, but neither variable affected the interaction between stereotype threat and gender. The current results fail to replicate the stereotype-threat effect by Johns et al., hence casting doubt on the generalizability of the effect of stereotype threat on women’s mathematics performance.

Behavior Research Methods

Not that cloze: Sentence constraint is influenced by language and language dominance
Ana Bautista, Clara D. Martin
Full text
In the fields of language processing and prediction, cloze tests are used to establish sentence constraint norms. The validity of cloze test results depends heavily on how closely the pre-test population matches the main study population, and yet there is limited evidence on how sociolinguistic variables may influence sentence constraint. Here, we investigate how language and language dominance influence sentence constraint at the lexical level by conducting a cloze test across different language groups and comparing response entropy. In Analysis 1, sentence constraint was similarly high for Spanish- and French-dominant speakers tested on the same translated sentences. However, their item-by-item alignment was moderate. In Analysis 2, non-dominant French speakers showed lower sentence constraint than dominant speakers overall. Dominant and non-dominant French speakers showed only moderate alignment, whereas the strongest alignment was observed between the two groups of non-dominant French speakers with different dominant languages. Our findings suggest that sentence expectations are shaped by language and language dominance. These findings are discussed considering theoretical proposals on the cloze test procedure, and offer informed practices for designing future language prediction studies across diverse speaker populations.
Identifying hidden cognate effects in L2 lexical retrieval tasks: A tutorial for stimulus design
Kelly Kendro, Alexander J. Holmberg
Full text
Introducing GABLE: Lightweight infrastructure for longitudinal experiments using Google Apps Script
Ibrahim Berber, Ilke Kas, Tarun Sepuri, Brooke N. Macnamara, M. Cenk ÇavuƟoğlu, Amy L. Wilson-Delfosse, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Philip J. Smith, Soumya Ray
Full text
Longitudinal studies are essential for understanding how behaviors, skills, and psychological states evolve over time. While online platforms have made study development easier, researchers still face major logistical challenges when managing multi-session studies, especially when coordinating large numbers of participants, session timing, reminders, and compensation. In this paper, we introduce GABLE ( G oogle A pps script- B ased L ongitudinal E xperimentation), a lightweight infrastructure built using Google Apps Script. GABLE automates participant scheduling, e-mail communication, session tracking, and compensation. We demonstrate its effectiveness through two real-world psychological studies involving more than 850 participants with 20 sessions, and discuss its benefits, limitations, and potential extensions. GABLE addresses many challenges of running large online longitudinal studies while limiting the need for custom infrastructure or manual intervention.
A tutorial on selecting, translating, and reporting variance priors in Bayesian multilevel models
Liu Liu
Full text
Bayesian multilevel models are increasingly used in psychological, educational, and behavioral research, yet applied guidance on specifying priors for scalar variance components remains limited. This tutorial provides a practical workflow for identifying target variance components, selecting benchmark values, calibrating priors on variance and standard-deviation scales, translating them into software-compatible prior specifications, evaluating their implications through prior predictive checks, posterior comparison, sensitivity analysis, and transparent reporting. We review several commonly used prior families, including gamma, inverse-gamma, half- t , and half-Cauchy distributions, and clarify how their parameterizations relate across variance, precision (the reciprocal of variance), and standard-deviation formulations. The tutorial focuses on helping researchers align prior choice with substantive knowledge, model parameterization, software constraints, and sensitivity goals. As a worked example, we use a two-level analysis of TIMSS 2019 data to show how benchmark information from a non-overlapping reference sample can be calibrated into alternative variance-prior specifications and then evaluated in a smaller worked example sample. The empirical illustration is used as a pedagogical example to demonstrate the workflow and its associated checking procedures. We emphasize practical safeguards, including prior-density inspection, prior predictive checking, posterior comparison, convergence assessment, sensitivity analysis, and transparent reporting of prior assumptions. The tutorial concludes by summarizing practical, literature-grounded considerations for documenting prior rationale, implementation decisions, and robustness checks in Bayesian multilevel applications.
A topic-based framework for interpretable and sparse semantic representations
Ming Song, Qing Cai
Full text
Combined eye tracking and electroencephalography during referential selection in dyadic interaction
Ingmar Brilmayer, Philip Georgis, Petra B. Schumacher
Full text
Understanding language in real-world interaction requires methods that integrate auditory, visual, and neural signals. We present a proof-of-concept study combining mobile electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking to investigate referential selection during dyadic communication. Using a simplified version of the director task, pairs of participants engaged in naturalistic object-movement instructions while EEG and gaze data were recorded and synchronized via LabStreamingLayer, allowing us to calculate overlap-corrected, regression-based event-related potentials (rERPs) time-locked to spoken nouns and to participants’ fixations, focusing on the N400/P300 (300–500 ms) and later (500–800 ms) time windows. Our results show that gaze behavior and fixation-related potentials provide crucial information for interpreting language-related ERPs: Targets competing with occluded referents elicited a stronger posterior positivity consistent with greater attentional demands. Fixation timing systematically modulated neural responses. Contrary to predictions, competitors received little visual attention, indicating that participants prioritized task-relevant information. These findings highlight the potential of multimodal data integration for understanding attentional and predictive mechanisms in real-world communication. Importantly, we show that established analytic techniques, such as artifact subspace reconstruction, independent component analysis, and linear deconvolution for ERP calculation, apply to noisy, naturalistic datasets. In addition, we provide a subsampling sensitivity approach to test the stability of the effects across different sample sizes. This study provides a methodological framework linking gaze and neural activity during interactive language processing. All preprocessing and analysis scripts, along with example datasets, are openly available on OSF ( https://osf.io/5ds4z ; a modified and optimized Python implementation is also available on GitHub: https://github.com/XlinCLab/DGAME ).
Engagement begins at recruitment: Comparing videoconference verification to passive online screening for participant retention and study engagement
Andrea L. Howard, Johanna Peetz
Full text
Real-time assessment of temperature sensitivity, pain processing, and pain behavior across the lifespan: Integrating stimulus data, contact force, and subjective ratings
Heinz-JĂŒrgen Steinhoff, Besim Prenaj, Sebastian L. KĂŒbel, Annekatrin Steinhoff
Full text
Assessments of temperature sensitivity and pain processing play an important role in psychological and psychiatry research, including with adolescent participants and across the lifespan. To ensure the validity and comparability of findings, experimental settings must be well tolerated and easily manageable for participants of all age groups and reliably monitored by the experimenter. These settings should promote reproducible procedures and support computer-assisted data acquisition and analysis to enable robust, efficient scientific evaluation. We present CAREST (Controlling and Recording Experiments in Sensitivity to Temperature), a PsychoPy-based tool for real-time assessment of temperature sensitivity, pain sensation, and pain response behavior via thermal induction. CAREST controls and communicates with a cold/hot plate and provides a touchscreen slider to assess pain sensation on a visual analog scale (VAS). The plate is placed on a platform with load cells to measure hand-plate contact force, providing an objective assessment of thermal contact between hand and plate surface during the experiment and participants’ approach versus avoidance tendencies in response to pain. CAREST continuously and synchronously records timestamped values of plate surface temperature, participants’ VAS ratings, and hand-plate contact force, enabling computation of several established and novel measures of pain sensitivity and related behavioral factors within a single experimental setting. In a pilot study with 94 participants, we examined heat and cold pain thresholds, intensities, tolerances, and hand-plate contact forces. The results highlight substantial heterogeneity in pain response behavior, with one out of five participants differing markedly from the modest average tendency toward pain avoidance.
Inclusive electroencephalography practices for Black and Muslim participation in a White non-Muslim-majority country: A co-produced tutorial
Damian Cruse, Ilham Razaie, Nyamesumpa Abbey, Natasha Bradbury, Yasmin Darawil, Hana Eldessoky, Fatima Farooq, Olivia Francis, Romy Froemer, Dorinda Lokko, Esther Nwakor, Amaliah-Saffron Odutola, Andrew Quinn, Nishita Sujan, Malaika Zabair
Full text
Most electroencephalography (EEG) research is conducted in White-majority Western countries by White researchers. EEG practices therefore often explicitly and implicitly exclude minoritised groups, leading to low diversity in EEG data samples that deepens biases in interpretation and clinical utility. Because EEG electrodes must contact the scalp, Black people and Muslim women who wear a hijab (or, Hijabis) are two systematically excluded groups. As a group of EEG researchers, Black people, and Hijabis, here we describe co-produced practical approaches to overcoming EEG participation barriers, from recruitment to data collection, and provide co-produced text, photographs, and videos designed to break down these barriers. These approaches provide further tools for the EEG community to tackle systemic exclusion and foster better, more representative neuroscience.
The samplr package: A tool for modeling human cognition with sampling algorithms
Lucas Castillo, Yun-Xiao Li, Adam N. Sanborn
Full text
Many models of cognition have sampling as a central component. Researchers have used them to explain human performance across a wide range of tasks involving perception, probability reasoning, and choice. One family of these models takes inspiration from sampling approaches developed in statistics, either by adjusting samples with prior beliefs or by implementing a sampling algorithm that overcomes the difficulty of independent samples at the expense of autocorrelation. While these models have been successful in modeling human behavior, their adoption has been slowed by the technical difficulties in applying them. Here, we introduce the  package, which includes a variety of these algorithms and cognitive models built upon them. We show how models in this package can match qualitative patterns found in human data, and walk readers through examples of how to compare these models quantitatively to human data. This tool aims to make these methods accessible to many more researchers.
Human-in-the-loop LLM-assisted thematic analysis: A validated, reproducible tutorial for large-scale qualitative research
Mandana Jafarian
Full text
Evaluating methods for testing publication bias in meta-analyses with confounding covariates: A simulation study
Man Chen
Full text
Selective publication of favorable results can bias meta-analytic estimates and threaten the validity of meta-analyses. Many methods that detect and adjust for publication bias perform poorly under substantial between-study heterogeneity. Heterogeneity complicates publication bias assessment because study characteristics may be associated with both effect size estimates and standard errors. These characteristics can induce an effect-precision association that regression-based diagnostics may misattribute to selective publication when such characteristics are omitted. However, it remains unclear how best to incorporate these confounding characteristics across methods and how their performance varies with confounding level, selective publication, residual heterogeneity, and the number of studies. To address this gap, I conduct an extensive Monte Carlo simulation evaluating Egger-type regression tests, residual-based tests, and a likelihood-ratio test of the three-parameter selection model (3PSM) under the one-step p  value selection mechanism. Results show that when confounding covariates were ignored, Egger-type regression tests and residual analyses exhibited inflated Type I error rates, whereas the 3PSM likelihood-ratio test maintained near-nominal, albeit slightly inflated, Type I error rates across conditions. When confounding covariates were incorporated, Egger-type tests had well-calibrated Type I error rates, residual analyses based on residualizing effect sizes alone tended to be conservative, and the 3PSM test showed slight inflation. Nevertheless, 3PSM consistently yielded higher power than other methods. Overall, the findings suggest that Egger-type regression tests and 3PSM can be used as complementary analyses for assessing selective publication when confounding covariates are present.
Accounting for response styles in rating data using IRT and IRTree models: A tutorial in R with applications to self-reported metacognitive competence
Thorsten Meiser, Esther Ulitzsch, Mirka Henninger
Full text
Response styles refer to individual differences in the use of the item response format irrespective of item content. They include tendencies to favor or avoid midpoint or extreme response categories, which can distort the measurement of latent constructs. This tutorial provides an overview of IRT and IRTree models that accommodate response style factors, allowing researchers to analyze response-style effects and adjust latent-trait estimates for potential bias. In particular, we give a practical guide to using IRT and IRTree models for response styles and illustrate the workflow of model implementation, estimation, and interpretation with an empirical data set on self-reported metacognitive competence (Double, 2025). Throughout the tutorial, IRT and IRTree models are specified with standard tools, and parameter estimation is accomplished in the common framework of multidimensional IRT with the package (Chalmers, 2012; Chalmers et al., 2025). The empirical results demonstrate that IRT and IRTree models can disentangle substantive traits and response styles, and that model-based estimates of substantive traits are adjusted accordingly. More specifically, both model classes reveal pronounced correlations among latent trait dimensions and among response style factors, but only small correlations between traits and response styles. In addition, the model-based trait estimates show the expected patterns of amplification and shrinkage after adjusting for midscale and extreme response style. The tutorial concludes with a discussion of recent developments in psychometric modeling.
Webcams can be used to study eye movements during reading
Marina Serrano-Carot, Bernhard Angele, Hemu Xu, Martin R. Vasilev
Full text
Eye movements have revealed a wealth of information about how readers process written language. Modern eye trackers can record eye movements in the lab with high accuracy. However, such equipment is expensive, and participant testing is labour-intensive. Kaduk et al. (Behav Res Methods 56(5):5002–5022, 2023) recently reported that webcam eye tracking may be a viable alternative, showing that webcams achieved correlations with laboratory eye trackers of ~0.83 during a free-viewing task. We conducted three experiments to test whether webcams can be used to study eye movements during reading. Participants read short sentences with a target word frequency manipulation while their eye movements were recorded with both an EyeLink system and a webcam in the laboratory (co-registration, Experiments 1 and 2) or online with their own webcam (online study, Experiment 3). In the lab, the webcam-based system recorded raw gaze positions that were highly correlated with the EyeLink (median r = 0.805), replicating Kaduk et al.’s results. We also found evidence for word frequency effects in the webcam data, but there was more noise than in the EyeLink data. In the online study, data quality was much poorer, but we still found reliable effects that were consistent with those observed in the laboratory. In summary, webcam-based eye tracking may be viable for studying reading, especially under laboratory conditions. However, obtaining useful data may require collecting many more observations when using webcams than with high-accuracy eye trackers.
Decisions under uncertainty: A statistical framework for evaluating practical relevance in interval-based hypothesis testing
Paul Riesthuis, Robert A. Cribbie, Victoria Celio, Nataly Beribisky
Full text

Computers in Human Behavior

Tracking fitness, comparing bodies: Social comparison and exercise activity among college students
Christina N. Selby, Kyle J. Holody, Elizabeth L. Carter
Full text
When interface style meets personality: Big five differences in self-extension and emotional attachment in online shopping platforms
HeSen Li, Hong Chen, WeiCheng Pan, WanQing Zhang, WenXing Lou, Qi Guo, BoHyeon Yoo
Full text
Does AI encourage lax thinking, or does the human preference for validation make it that way?
Braden T. Hall, William Hart
Full text
Prevalence and correlates of GenerativeAI chatbot use for mental health concerns in higher education students
Elyse J. Thulin
Full text

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

A signal detection analysis of source effects on misinformation susceptibility
Nyx L. Ng, Fabian M. Wurzinger, Bertram Gawronski
Full text
Recovering from inauthenticity: Counterfactual thinking and the consequences of feeling inauthentic
Madelyn H. Church, Kianna M. Arthur, Kyle J. Dickey, Grace N. Rivera
Full text
Evidence for ideological confirmation, or how to politicize color intensity perceptions
William P. Hart, Danielle E. Wahlers, Braden T. Hall
Full text

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Mode-Matched Inverse-Gamma Priors for Variance Components in Bayesian Multilevel Models
Liu Liu
Full text
Idiographic Item Response Theory: Modeling Person-Specific Differential Item Functioning in Intensive Longitudinal Data
Joshua B. Gilbert, Edward J. Kim, Zachary Himmelsbach, Esther Ulitzsch, Lijin Zhang
Full text
Reducing Boundary Estimates and Increasing Power in Detecting Individual Differences in Change: The Effect of Adding a Quadratic Term
Manshu Yang, Lijuan Wang, Scott E. Maxwell
Full text
MI- Random rPQL : A Variable Selection Method for Linear Mixed Models with Missing Data
Yutian T. Thompson, Yaqi Li
Full text
Possible Solutions to Heywood Cases in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Yijun Cheng, Weicong Lyu, Oscar L. Olvera Astivia
Full text
Testing Group Differences in Nonlinear Growth Curve Modeling with Penalized Spline
Han Du, Yang Liu, Zhiyong Zhang
Full text
Homogeneity-Pursuit Calibration of Item Response Theory Models with Limited Samples and Sparse Response Data
Shiyu Wang, Cong Cheng, Yuan Ke, Zichu Liu
Full text

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Less Is More: Why and When Having Less Signals Competence
Ruobing Fu, Jingyi Lu
Full text
Living with less has become increasingly popular in contemporary culture. It can simplify people’s lives and enhance their well-being. Beyond these intrapersonal benefits, we document a novel, interpersonal benefit of having less: individuals who own fewer possessions are perceived as more competent than those who own more. This effect arises because observers infer that they rely more on reasoning rather than feelings in decision-making. We further develop a three-condition descriptive model specifying that the effect emerges when having fewer possessions appears voluntary, when the possessions are primarily non-hedonic, and when the quantity of possessions is sufficient to meet minimum needs. This research extends the literature on the benefits of having less from an intrapersonal to an interpersonal perspective and identifies possession quantity as a new cue for perceived competence.
Implicit Prejudice Differentially Predicts Placement Into Valuable and Scarce Opportunities
Yeji Park, Stacey Sinclair
Full text
Racial excellence gaps persist, partly due to unequal participation in advanced learning opportunities. Guided by the opportunity hoarding framework, this research investigates whether White Americans’ pro-White/anti-Black prejudice differentially predict simulated Advanced Placement (AP) course admission decisions, and under what conditions—when the opportunity is valuable, scarce, or both. Across two experiments, we observed an unexpected overall pattern in which Black students were placed into higher priority tiers than White students. Nonetheless, greater implicit prejudice predicted larger White–Black differences in placement decisions, explained by placing Black students into lower tiers rather than White students into higher tiers. Critically, we found preliminary evidence that this pattern emerges only when AP participation was described as both valuable and scarce. Explicit prejudice showed less consistent associations with differences in placement decisions across studies. The valuable and scarce nature of advanced learning opportunities may amplify the effect of implicit prejudice in deciding who deserves access.

Psychological Methods

Structural-before/after-measurement approaches for estimating treatment effects in latent outcomes with causal machine learning.
Amota Ataneka, Benjamin Kelcey, Jean Baptiste Habarurema
Full text
The semipartial correlation needs no correction. Comment on Park and Yi (2025).
Peter de Heus
Full text
Working with circular data: A tutorial for cognitive and behavioral research.
Stella Wernicke, Julie de Falco, Zahara GironĂ©s, Chris Jungerius, Ivan Tomić, Adam Triabhall, Xiaolu Wang, Paul M. Bays
Full text

Psychology of Music

Personal and Social Listening Habits in the Streaming Era – Psychosocial Model
Tal Vaizman, Gal Harpaz
Full text
The streaming era has reshaped the ways music is intertwined with personal and social experiences, including engagement, sharing, event participation, discussion, and the creation of meaning. This study introduces the Personal and Social Listening Habits (PSLHab) model, predicting Music Consumption Habits (MCH), by open-mindedness, via the mediation of (a) Music Mentoring Preferences (MMP), and (b) savoring art. A four-stage study, based on two samples ( N1 = 495; N2 = 499) of music listeners, led to the development of the PSLHab model. The operational validation confirmed the two new theoretical variables: four factors of MMP (human or algorithmic recommendations; active or passive search) and four factors of MCH (personal or social listening; discussing or attending events). Moreover, the results show that MMP and savoring art mediate the relationship between open-mindedness and MCH, while the preference for active use of algorithmic recommendations is the strongest mediator. The study highlights how personal characteristics and preferences for musical exposure through mentoring influence social and personal behaviors around music, and explores musical exposure’s implications regarding social interactions.

Technology, Mind, and Behavior

Beyond accuracy: How humans evaluate legally correct but socially controversial legal advice from machines.
Benjamin Minhao Chen, Zhiyu Li
Full text