Internal displacement is a pressing global problem that has escalated to an appalling scale, especially considering that over 71 million individuals were forcibly displaced by the end of 2022. Nigeria is one of the nations within sub-Saharan Africa that report the highest number of cases of internally displaced persons (IDPs), mostly caused by cyclical conflict and catastrophic floods. Although information related to the presence of IDPs in formal camps or staying with host families is abundant, there is a conspicuous gap in the literature concerning those individuals, living in non-camp settings, who have already established themselves within communities and are often not visible to formal support networks. This paper set out to illuminate the peculiar issues and plight of such non-camped IDPs in the Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. The study took a qualitative approach, rooted in interpretivism, and employed a case study design. Given that this particular subset of the population was difficult to identify, the researcher used snowball sampling, ending up with a sample of 14 respondents, including internally displaced persons (IDPs), key informants, and mendicants. They gathered data by using key informant interviews (KIIs) and semi-structured interviews and analysed the data using thematic analysis. The results shed light on three major thematic areas: challenges faced, effects of non-camp environment on various aspects of the lives of IDPS and survival strategies. Data from the interviews revealed that the bulk of the problems that non-camp IDPs face are lack of basic amenities, extreme health problems, extreme financial instability, daily insecurity, and social isolation. The vulnerability this group faces in the form of theft, violence and harassment is compounded by the lack of formal protection. Besides, living conditions are unstable and have a significant impact on livelihood, education interruption, and housing instability. To endure, the IDPs employ various survival tactics, such as supplementing random jobs with mendicancy, resorting to self-medication and informal social groups to stay healthy, and maintaining safety by staying in groups. The paper concludes that non-camp IDPs are caught in a web of vulnerability that is compounded by the absence of formalised support systems, which make their situation distinctively unique to that of formal camp settings. The results suggest that the most effective approach to helping this peculiar population is a combination of various interventions, such as increased access to healthcare, livelihood support, improved community security, and better housing to help them recover and experience social integration in the long term.
Keywords: Internal displacement, internally displaced person (IDP), non-camp, integration, challenges