I checked 9 sociology journals on Tuesday, October 20, 2026 using the Crossref API. For the period October 13 to October 19, I found 14 new paper(s) in 5 journal(s).

Social Forces

Nonstandard work, nonstandard lives? Temporary employment, unemployment, and family transitions
Hande Inanc
Full text
It is well documented that unemployment is closely associated with family outcomes, affecting the occurrence, timing, and sequencing of key family transitions. Individuals with unemployment experience are more likely to postpone marriage, enter cohabiting unions, transition into parenthood outside marriage, and experience partnership dissolution. Temporary employment is often regarded as a better alternative because it provides income, opportunities for skill accumulation, and continued attachment to the labor market. In reality, however, temporary jobs are characterized by substantial insecurity and strain, which may have important consequences for family lives. Applying discrete-time event history analysis to nationally representative longitudinal data from the British household panel study, I show that temporary employment constitutes a meaningful source of uncertainty with substantial consequences for family formation and stability. The consequences of employment insecurity vary by educational attainment, gender, and union type. Educational differences strongly condition men’s family responses to employment insecurity, while for women education primarily structures exposure rather than buffering its consequences. Cohabitation functions as an adaptive response to unemployment but not to temporary employment, which is instead associated with greater instability of cohabiting unions. Together, these findings highlight the importance not only of employment, but of stable employment, for family formation and stability.

Social Networks

Network members can hide from group centrality measures
Marcin Waniek, Andrzej Nagórko, Talal Rahwan
Full text

Social Science Research

Debt and early midlife substance use and suicidal ideation
Samuel H. Fishman, Mackenzie Brewer, Matthew Andersson
Full text
Family migration and gender inequality in housework: Evidence from China
Min Zhu, Stephanie Steinmetz, Franciska Krings
Full text
Children’s educational outcomes: Variation by children’s living arrangements and exposure to maternal criminal legal system involvement
Renzo Fernandez Escobar, Sarah Font
Full text

Sociological Science

Violent Conflict and Family Investment in Education
Dulce Manzano, Héctor Cebolla-Boado
Full text
Reactionary Brokering: How Families Navigate the Strains of Jail Incarceration
Kristin Turney, Steven Schmidt, Isha Bhallamudi, Amy Liu, Ashley Torres
Full text
Even More Unequal Childhoods: 45 Years of Widening Income Gaps in Parental Investments in the United States
Orestes Hastings
Full text
The Happiness Paradox of Birth Order
Tamkinat Rauf
Full text
Social Inequalities in Bereavement across the Life Course: A Study of Four-Generation Kinship Networks in Sweden
Isaac Sasson, Linus Andersson, Alyson van Raalte, Diego Alburez-Gutierrez
Full text
Tracing Politicization in the U.S. Public Sphere, 1980–2024
Terrence Chen
Full text
Governing the Agora—Informal Communication in Reputation-Based Online Markets
Ana Macanovic, Wojtek Przepiorka, Vincent Buskens
Full text

Socius

Happiness Loves Company? Positive Affect and the Momentary Social Context
Alyssa W. Goldman, Sara M. Moorman
Full text
Being in the company of other people is a key determinant of emotional well-being, including positive affect. Many spaces where older adults spend time alone are also social spaces, but less is known about whether simply being in the vicinity of other people matters for positive affect. The authors distinguish between two social states: being with others (purposeful social company) and being around others (sharing space with people who are not focal social companions). In a series of multilevel models, the authors examined whether being with others and being around others have independent and interactive associations with positive affect. The authors used data from 12,860 ecological momentary assessments collected from 352 older adults living in Chicago in 2018 and 2019. Both being with others and being around others were independently associated with greater positive affect. Being alone, but around others, was associated with greater positive affect than being alone with no others around. Positive affect was highest when older adults were simultaneously with and around others. These findings suggest that both direct companionship and the broader social environment contribute to older adults’ emotional well-being. Interventions and policies that create opportunities for older adults to spend time in social spaces, even without a companion, may support emotional well-being.
Does Birth Order Influence Romantic Compatibility? A Study of Marriage Durations
Seymour Spilerman, Kieron Barclay
Full text
The authors examine the relationship between the birth-order pairings of spouses and marital success using a sample of some 239,000 couples from Swedish population registers. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first large-sample study of birth order and divorce that uses the couple, rather than the individual, as the unit of analysis. The relevance of birth order in romantic relationships has long fascinated the lay public and has given rise to a marital advice literature that purports to explain marital success in terms of birth-order pairings. The present article is divided into two sections. In the first, the authors investigate claims about birth order and marital success prevalent in the popular literature and show that they have little validity. In the second, the authors undertake an analysis of birth order and divorce risk, which reveals two major birth-order impacts: a pronounced only-child effect, in that couples in which either spouse is an only child have a notably higher divorce rate than couples in which neither is an only child, and for men, a protective effect against divorce from marriage to a first-born woman with siblings, an outcome that does not have a counterpart for women in their own pairing choices.