I checked 9 sociology journals on Friday, October 23, 2026 using the Crossref API. For the period October 16 to October 22, I found 10 new paper(s) in 5 journal(s).

American Journal of Sociology

The Evolutionary Dynamics of Cultural Change(As Told Through the Birth and Brutal, Blackened Death of Metal Music)
Bernard J. Koch, Daniele Silvestro, Jacob G. Foster
Full text

Social Forces

Structuralizing the stress process: states as contextual determinants of stress and mental health
Rachel Donnelly, Zhe Zhang, Mateo P Farina, Blake W Powell
Full text
Despite growing evidence that policy environments influence mental health, we have limited knowledge of how policy environments influence the stress processes that shape mental health. This study develops and tests a theoretical framework that structuralizes the stress process model by explicating how the state policy context (1) directly influences mental health, (2) indirectly influences mental health via stress exposure, and (3) mitigates the impact of stressors on mental health. This study uses nationally representative data from the Household Pulse Survey (2020–2023; n = 3,043,961) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS; 2015–2019; n = 1,989,932) merged with state policy liberalism data to consider how state policy liberalism—the ideological orientation of state policies—shapes mental health. Results show that more liberal state policies were associated with lower odds of probable depression, probable anxiety, and frequent mental distress and weakened associations between three focal economic stressors—income loss, financial hardship, employment status—and mental health outcomes. Moreover, the association between state policy liberalism and mental health was partially mediated by financial hardship. Findings differed slightly by age: mediation via financial hardship was more evident among older adults (65+), whereas the buffering of economic-related stressors was mostly among adults under sixty-five. Overall, this study demonstrates the importance of a structuralized stress process model for mental health research.
Leaving together: social influence and church decline
Elis Carlberg Larsson, Peter Hedström
Full text
Church membership has declined across much of the Western world in recent decades. Existing research has identified individual characteristics that affect individuals’ likelihood of leaving their churches, but far less is known about how social interactions influence church decline. We examine (1) how exposure to others leaving the Church of Sweden affects individuals’ likelihood of leaving and (2) the aggregate membership dynamics generated by these micro-level processes. Using full-population register data from 2002 to 2023 and a dynamic matched-sample design, we estimate social-influence effects and assess how susceptibility varies with religious embeddedness, defined as the extent to which individuals are socially connected to other church members. We use these estimates to calibrate an agent-based simulation model linking individual behavior to aggregate membership decline. The results show that exposure to leavers increases individuals’ likelihood of leaving the Church, particularly among those with weak religious embeddedness. The simulations indicate that social influence contributed appreciably to the numerical decline of the Church of Sweden, while religious embeddedness moderated this effect. Social influence can thus amplify ongoing religious decline, while religious embeddedness attenuates this amplification.
Review of “Family Legal Vulnerability: How Immigration Policy Shapes the Lives of Latino College Students”
Edelina Burciaga
Full text
Nonstandard work, nonstandard lives? Temporary employment, unemployment, and family transitions
Hande Inanc
Full text
It is well documented that unemployment is closely associated with family outcomes, affecting the occurrence, timing, and sequencing of key family transitions. Individuals with unemployment experience are more likely to postpone marriage, enter cohabiting unions, transition into parenthood outside marriage, and experience partnership dissolution. Temporary employment is often regarded as a better alternative because it provides income, opportunities for skill accumulation, and continued attachment to the labor market. In reality, however, temporary jobs are characterized by substantial insecurity and strain, which may have important consequences for family lives. Applying discrete-time event history analysis to nationally representative longitudinal data from the British household panel study, I show that temporary employment constitutes a meaningful source of uncertainty with substantial consequences for family formation and stability. The consequences of employment insecurity vary by educational attainment, gender, and union type. Educational differences strongly condition men’s family responses to employment insecurity, while for women education primarily structures exposure rather than buffering its consequences. Cohabitation functions as an adaptive response to unemployment but not to temporary employment, which is instead associated with greater instability of cohabiting unions. Together, these findings highlight the importance not only of employment, but of stable employment, for family formation and stability.

Social Networks

From lifestyle to citizenship: Social influence and political consumerism in egocentric networks
Xueying Zhang, Ting Wang
Full text

Social Science Research

Family migration and gender inequality in housework: Evidence from China
Min Zhu, Stephanie Steinmetz, Franciska Krings
Full text
A randomized trial of poverty reduction in the US and residential mobility to lower-crime neighborhoods
Abhery Das, Theresa L. Osypuk, Lisa A. Gennetian, Katherine Magnuson, Tim A. Bruckner
Full text
Children’s educational outcomes: Variation by children’s living arrangements and exposure to maternal criminal legal system involvement
Renzo Fernandez Escobar, Sarah Font
Full text

Socius

Happiness Loves Company? Positive Affect and the Momentary Social Context
Alyssa W. Goldman, Sara M. Moorman
Full text
Being in the company of other people is a key determinant of emotional well-being, including positive affect. Many spaces where older adults spend time alone are also social spaces, but less is known about whether simply being in the vicinity of other people matters for positive affect. The authors distinguish between two social states: being with others (purposeful social company) and being around others (sharing space with people who are not focal social companions). In a series of multilevel models, the authors examined whether being with others and being around others have independent and interactive associations with positive affect. The authors used data from 12,860 ecological momentary assessments collected from 352 older adults living in Chicago in 2018 and 2019. Both being with others and being around others were independently associated with greater positive affect. Being alone, but around others, was associated with greater positive affect than being alone with no others around. Positive affect was highest when older adults were simultaneously with and around others. These findings suggest that both direct companionship and the broader social environment contribute to older adults’ emotional well-being. Interventions and policies that create opportunities for older adults to spend time in social spaces, even without a companion, may support emotional well-being.